This is where you talk about the NXJ hardware related topics such as the brick, sensors, LEGO pieces, etc
Moderators: roger, 99jonathan, imaqine
by takashic » Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:45 am
I have tested performance of LCD display of leJOS NXJ (platform C) and
it seems that current implementation of spi interface for display update uses software polling to send the data and it causes slower performance. I noticed that leJOS developers already noticed and listed up in the Priority List:
11. Performance improvements. Some things like the way the display is updated mean that leJOS NXJ could be much faster. Its currently a lot slower than RobotC.
Then, I have two questions:
1. If spi interrupt is used instead of software polling, will the performance be dramatically improved?
2. what is your plan on this?
Thanks,
-
takashic
- Novice
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:22 am
by bbagnall » Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:04 pm
Hi Takashi,
Sorry for the slow reply.
Yes, our plan is to make it interrupt driven. One of our earlier developers who isn't active anymore was going to make this change but never got around to it. If it's something you'd like to tackle we would be very thankful as we want to submit some speed comparisons for NXJ and the LCD slowness is stopping us from doing it currently.
-

bbagnall
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:03 pm
by takashic » Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:01 am
The new LCD display functions seem to be progressed well in the trunk.
Once I used to tacle this feature, but have't done it. Sorry.
I would like to contribute as a tester.
Thanks,
Takashi
-
takashic
- Novice
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:22 am
by takashic » Fri Nov 23, 2007 6:41 am
I have tested the new LCD diplay code and it works pretty well!
However, there is one question about "nxt_lcd_init".
void
nxt_lcd_init(void)
{
systick_wait_ms(1000); <- This one
nxt_spi_init();
nxt_lcd_power_up();
}
nxt_lcd_init has 1 sec wait and This will be included in the next NXT offcial release? or it will be moved to main function?
Thanks,
Takashi
-
takashic
- Novice
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:22 am
by gloomyandy » Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:41 pm
Hi,
To be honest I'm not sure why there is the 1s delay in this function. I'll take a look. It may be there to allow things to settle before updating the hardware....
Andy
-

gloomyandy
- leJOS Team Member
-
- Posts: 3004
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: UK
by takashic » Tue Dec 25, 2007 4:52 am
gloomyandy wrote:Hi,
To be honest I'm not sure why there is the 1s delay in this function. I'll take a look. It may be there to allow things to settle before updating the hardware....
Andy
Thanks Andy,
As far as I tested, if the 1s delay was removed, there would be no issue in a LEJOS OSEK program.
Takashi
-
takashic
- Novice
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:22 am
by lawrie » Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:00 am
I put the 1 second delay in when I first got leJOS running from flash memory. Without it, my NXT sometimes started up with the LCD not working. Even with it this still occasionally happens. It could be a problem with the specific NXT as I have not noticed it on my other NXT.
I will test this again and remove it if it appears unnecessary now, or move it to main.c.
-
lawrie
- leJOS Team Member
-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:27 pm
Return to NXJ Hardware
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest